THE APEX TIMES
The Michigan Senate candidate, Abdul El-Sayed, acknowledged that his sister-in-law was placed on a U.S. terrorism watch list under the Obama administration, while saying she “did nothing wrong” and that she was later taken off the list after filing a lawsuit.
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed said he acknowledges that his sister-in-law was placed on a U.S. terrorism watch list during the Obama administration, according to a report published Monday by the New York Post.
El-Sayed disputed the basis for the listing, the report says, and maintained that his sister-in-law “did nothing wrong.” The report frames the acknowledgment as part of El-Sayed’s efforts to respond publicly to questions about the watch list episode.
According to the report, El-Sayed also said the individual was removed from the watch list after taking legal action. The report characterizes the removal as occurring following a lawsuit filed by the sister-in-law, which El-Sayed cited as the path that ultimately resolved the matter.
The report does not provide additional publicly documented details in its account about what the underlying watch-list criteria were, what specific allegations or records were involved, or which U.S. government agency made the decision to place the individual on the list. It likewise does not describe the standards or procedures used to reach the initial determination or the exact timeline for review and removal beyond El-Sayed’s statement that the matter was handled through litigation.
Watch lists and related terrorism screening processes are carried out under federal authorities and are not typically accompanied by public explanations in individual cases. In the absence of a detailed record in the reporting, the practical focus of the dispute, as described by the report, centers on whether due-process protections and review mechanisms operated effectively for the individual once challenged in court.
El-Sayed’s acknowledgment and his account of the lawsuit and subsequent removal bring the episode into the foreground as he runs for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, where voters and watchdog groups have routinely demanded scrutiny of candidates’ claims and affiliations. The New York Post report indicates El-Sayed is presenting the watch-list episode as a matter that was contested and resolved through legal action.
The next factual step, based on what is described in the report, would be identifying the court filings and any resulting orders or statements tied to the sister-in-law’s lawsuit, which would clarify the government’s justification, the evidence cited, and the basis for removal from the terrorism watch list.
