GOP lawyer Ben Ginsberg says there is “still no evidence” that 2020 election results were incorrect as Trump administration’s election-security push faces scrutiny

President Donald Trump’s Thursday evening primetime address renewed public discussion about alleged voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, prompting a response from Republican election lawyer Ben Ginsberg, who said he remains unaware of evidence showing that any election result was incorrect.

According to The Hill, Ginsberg disputed the premise behind the administration’s revived fraud narrative, emphasizing that there is “still no evidence of a result of any election being incorrect.” The comments were framed as a direct rebuttal to claims Trump administration officials have circulated about the security and reliability of the 2020 vote.

The Hill reported that ahead of Trump’s speech, the White House promoted “breaking news” regarding the state of election security in the United States and released a package of materials for public review. The same report said the administration presented its materials as supporting the need for further attention to election integrity and security concerns.

In his public response, Ginsberg challenged that characterization, underscoring that the factual record has not demonstrated that the certified outcomes of elections were wrong. He also questioned the evidentiary basis for claims of widespread fraud, a point that has been central to renewed allegations resurfacing in recent months.

The dispute highlights a recurring division between efforts to intensify scrutiny of election administration and those arguing that existing investigations and court proceedings have not established that the 2020 election results were flawed. Ginsberg’s position, as described by The Hill, puts emphasis on the absence of proof rather than on whether election security problems can exist in specific localities.

No Federal Register notice or White House-authored document confirming the administration’s specific “breaking news” materials or any election-related executive action was identified in the provided evidence. The Hill’s report described the administration’s public messaging and file release, but official confirmation for any particular government action beyond the stated promotional effort was not available in the record reviewed for this story.