THE APEX TIMES
Outlet reports Democrats moved to make South Carolina the first 2028 presidential primary state, displacing Iowa and New Hampshire
New York Post reports Democratic Party plans for the 2028 presidential nominating calendar would place South Carolina at the start of the primary season, reshaping the long-running early-voting order centered on Iowa and New Hampshire.
South Carolina is reportedly being positioned by Democrats to host the first presidential primary of the 2028 election cycle, according to a report published Friday by the New York Post. The outlet described the move as a potential advantage for a prospective third White House bid by Vice President Kamala Harris, though it did not provide documentary evidence in the report itself of when or how the change would be implemented.
The report says Democrats would “dethrone” Iowa and New Hampshire from their familiar roles as the opening states in the nominating calendar, with South Carolina emerging as the first contest. It frames the adjustment as a significant procedural step for party-run presidential primaries and caucuses, which can shift candidate strategy, media attention, and the order in which states allocate attention and delegates early in the cycle.
While party rules can be adjusted through internal Democratic processes, the practical implications of moving a state to the front of the primary order extend beyond timing. Early primaries can influence how campaigns allocate resources, how quickly they test messaging with voters and local party organizations, and when delegates from the earliest contests become available to shape subsequent competition.
The New York Post story does not appear, on its face, to include a publicly verifiable primary-source artifact such as an official Democratic National Committee calendar document, a state filing, or a binding party rule update. It also does not cite an official federal filing or an election administration document that would confirm the new order as a matter of record.
The next step, if Democrats pursue a formal change, would be publication or adoption of the updated primary calendar through the relevant party mechanisms and state election authorities. Absent a primary-source calendar update, the reported change remains a claim of intent attributed to the outlet, not a confirmed, enforceable schedule.
A separate consideration is how any change interacts with the legal and administrative requirements governing state elections and party rules. Presidential primaries are run by states under state election codes, while party nomination processes depend on national party rules for delegate allocation; a shift in “first” status typically requires both sets of conditions to align in time for the 2028 cycle.
Why It Matters
- Changing the order of presidential primaries affects when voters and delegates begin accumulating in the nominating process.
- It can alter campaign spending patterns and the sequence of campaign messaging and field operations across early states.
- If adopted through official Democratic rules and state processes, it would change a long-standing framework of early presidential testing focused on Iowa and New Hampshire.
- Until an official calendar or rules update is published and/or adopted, the reported shift remains unconfirmed as an enforceable schedule for 2028.
Sources
- reporting
- White House Presidential Actions: Nominations and Withdrawals Sent to the Senate
- White House Presidential Actions: Democrats Fought Against Historic Tax Cuts. Now They’re Fighting Against Opportunity for America’s Kids.
- White House Presidential Actions: President Trump Rings in Trump Accounts with Historic Opening Bell Ceremony from the Oval Office
- White House Presidential Actions: “Excellent Choice”: Jay Clayton Earns Broad Praise as President Trump’s DNI Nominee
- White House Presidential Actions: Nomination and Withdrawal Sent to the Senate
Key Facts
- The New York Post reported on July 24, 2026 that Democrats moved to place South Carolina first in the 2028 presidential primary calendar.
- The report says the move would replace Iowa and New Hampshire as the early-voting states.
- The report ties the potential impact to whether Kamala Harris would pursue another White House bid, but it does not supply an official confirmation of the change.
- No official party document, state election authority filing, or Federal Register entry confirming the calendar change is included in the provided material.