THE APEX TIMES
Meta says WhatsApp usernames include multiple safeguards against scams and that the feature is not yet live, after India raised cybersecurity concerns and directed the company to provide an explanation within three days.
Meta Platforms is defending its WhatsApp username feature after the Indian government warned it could increase online fraud, and ordered the company to respond under the country’s information technology regulations, according to reporting Tuesday.
In an email to CNBC, a Meta spokesperson said users still must provide a phone number to use WhatsApp and that the company has built “multiple layers of defense against scams into usernames.” Meta described steps it says are designed to reduce impersonation and guessing, including limiting how many people an account can contact and blocking repeated attempts to guess usernames.
Meta also said it will use systems to detect and remove activity that matches patterns associated with impersonation or abuse. Separately, the company said the username feature is “not live” and that it will be rolled out “slowly later this year,” suggesting changes or safeguards could be refined before broad deployment.
The dispute followed India’s government action raising cybersecurity risks tied to usernames, which allow account identification without displaying phone numbers. Reporting cited an Indian government assessment that usernames may “materially increase” incidents of online fraud including phishing, “digital arrest” scams, and impersonation attacks by enabling bad actors to solicit and message potential victims.
According to CNBC, India gave Meta three days to furnish a detailed explanation of the feature. The government also directed Meta to pause the rollout, framing the company’s response as necessary before regulators decide on further steps under applicable IT rules.
The Indian regulatory posture arrives amid heightened scrutiny of messaging apps. CNBC noted that in June, India temporarily banned Telegram after it said the platform enabled exam fraud, underscoring that regulators have been willing to intervene when they conclude a service creates practical harm.
Meta’s response places the focus on how safeguards function in real-world conditions, including whether the rollout timeline and technical controls sufficiently mitigate automated outreach and impersonation. With the three-day deadline described by CNBC, the next procedural step is the company’s filing to regulators, followed by any decision by Indian authorities on whether and how the username feature can proceed.
For WhatsApp users, the immediate effect is uncertain in practice, but Meta’s stated position is that the usernames are not yet broadly available and that the company intends to manage contact and abusive behavior through rate limits, anti-guessing controls, and detection systems before wider release.
